Every PM has written a PRD that took three days and got read by exactly nobody. Not because the thinking was bad — because the document asked the reader to do the thinking for you.
Lead with the decision, not the context
Engineers and designers open a PRD to answer one question: what am I building and why does it matter? If that answer is buried under three paragraphs of market context, you’ve already lost the room. Put the decision in the first two sentences. Everything else is supporting evidence.
A PRD is not a record of your thinking. It’s a tool for someone else’s thinking.
— Tanvir Ahmed
At my last two companies, we moved to a one-page format with a strict rule: if it doesn’t change what gets built, it doesn’t belong in the doc. Appendices exist for a reason — use them.
Write the FAQ before anyone asks
The fastest way to kill a 40-comment review thread is to answer the five questions you already know are coming, right in the doc. It feels like more work upfront. It’s always less work overall.
Comments (3)
Log in to join the conversation
Log InSadia Afrin
Aug 13, 2026The "FAQ before anyone asks" bit is exactly what our reviews are missing. Stealing this for next sprint.
Tanvir Ahmed
Aug 13, 2026Steal away — happy to share the actual template if useful.
Imran Kabir
MentorAug 13, 2026Strong agree on decision-first. I’ve started rejecting PRDs in review if I can’t find the ask in the first screen.
Farzana Rahman
MentorAug 14, 2026Would love a follow-up on how design specs fit into this — we still end up duplicating a lot of the "why".